What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

US housing market now has 500K more sellers than buyers — and it’s leading to a shift in the balance of power - Yahoo Finance

in structures, such as:

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

Why do some men want to remain single despite the fact that many women want to have a romantic relationship with them?

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

What are some good methods for dealing with other people's loud, crying kids on long flights?

a b i 1 x []

+ for

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

The Best Time to Take Calcium Supplements for Maximum Absorption, According to Dietitians - EatingWell

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.